Main

Opinion

Mostly rants about various issues.

September 17, 2007

So Much for Global Citizenship

Stories like this bother me. There was a terrible plane crash in Thailand, and all the Canadian media is focussed on is whether or not Canadians were injured. In the Vancouver Sun today, in a story apparently published before they found out a Canadian was killed, the focus of the story was on the Canadian survivor's French bulldog, who died in the cargo hold. How sad is that? Apparently Canada.com feels that the dog's death was more worthy of media coverage than say, a citizen of another country.

May 14, 2007

Things That Annoy Me: Gas Price Stories

There are a few journalistic devices that really bother me - one of them is one journalists interview other journalists - don't get me started on that. Another is the "Gas Price Story." I find it very lazy when journalists interview people at the pumps about whether or not they think gas prices are too high. Guess what? If they're buying gas, particularly if they're filling up their SUV, they probably think it's too expensive! But there are many people out there, me included, who drive only occasionally. And guess what? I don't care at all what gas prices are - in fact I see a silver lining in these high prices if it means fewer people driving. So maybe they should stop interviewing the owners of SUV and ask people standing in line at the bus.

Another popular one is the passport story. Yes - passports lines are long. Yes - it's a pain to wait in line for your passport. And those being interviewed at the end of a very long line are even more likely to be irritated. Okay, the government should have been a bit better prepared, but perhaps some of these people should have planned ahead of time and gotten their passports a few months before they were needed - no need to wait in line when you do that - you can do it all by mail.

November 07, 2006

Shocker!

Britney and Kevin divorcing!

britney and kevin

If these two kids can't make it - how can there be hope for any of us?

September 19, 2006  (One Year Ago Today)

Opening New Worlds of Possibility for Lying on Internet Dating Sites

Wow - I just came across a link to HP's camera website in which they advertise a new "slimming feature" on their cameras. It really, really, really, looks like a joke, but it appears to be legit.

Here's a direct quote:


They say cameras add ten pounds, but HP digital cameras can help reverse that effect. The slimming feature, available on select HP digital camera models, is a subtle effect that can instantly trim off pounds from the subjects in your photos!

Naturally the models for the slimming effect examples are lithe women who already appear to be at the low end of the body mass index. Thanks to HP we can all look like Kate Moss!

But can it make me look like this? (Warning - kind of gross)

January 18, 2006  (One Year Ago Today)

Election

So on my way to get a tea and cookie this morning, I ran into our local incumbent candidate - Stephen Owen. I stopped briefly on the way in, but while getting my cookie, thought of a few questions.

I quizzed him on student funding, day care, and of course mandatory minimum sentences. I raised my constitutionality question about whether it was even constitutional to impose them, and he was able to refer to the Smith case (the one I mentioned in my last post!) - now, not that impressive since he is a former law professor, but it gave me a little thrill. So he's in agreement, that certainly the long ones are unconstitutional. Now what was interesting to me was that Owen said that the Green Party was proposing minimum sentences for gun crimes, some as long as 10 years. This was surprising to me - I checked their platform, and they do make reference to mandatory minimum sentences, though I found nothing about 10 years per se.

He seemed to have a much more comprehensive idea of criminal problems, and even mentioned increased funding for sports programs in communities for kids. He is Minister of Sport, so I guess he's had some time to think about that, but it was new to me, and is the type of long-term strategy I've been interested in seeing. Obviously, it would have to be part of something comprehensive, but I liked it.

I certainly hope to see more candidates around UBC. I did get a pamphlet from the Conservative, along with a long list of "justice" initiatives, such as longer sentences, no house arrests and so on. To me that seems like an expensive and ineffective way to combat crime.

January 16, 2006

Know What Bugs Me?

How while the media outlets are busy reporting on the latest polls, few note how the polls were all wrong in the last election. Have the methods changed? Are they now more accurate? Why should we trust that they're right about a Conservative majority this time when they were wrong last time?

Here's
an article that talks a little bit about the last pollster screw-up... and this one which discussed the margin of error in polls.

Apparently CBC has a policy of not reporting polls unless they show a "dramatic shift," unlike some stations which goes into palpitations over every .1%

January 09, 2006

Federal Debate

Okay well, the debate is raging. I missed the earlier ones, and with Stephen Harper apparently decisively ahead in the polls - this one is critical.

Lots of talking about minimum sentences at the beginning. Seems the three national parties are in favour of it, except the Bloc. Hmm - that doesn't leave a lot of options. I'm opposed to minimum sentences, not to mention that they may be against the Charter. I guess the leaders went to law school before R. v. Smith.

Layton talks directly to the camera, slowly and clearly. He's doing the best job of addressing me directly, but his speech is a little too rehearsed and polished. He sounds more like an ad man than someone mid-debate. Talk to the other leaders as well as the cameras Jack!

Duceppe is remarkably amusing. Doesn't have a lot to lose in an English debate I guess... he can say what he thinks, and much of it is smart.

Martin wasn't all that strong during the debate; unlike Jack, he doesn't seem to be addressing MOI! But he gets a great end coup with his dig at Harper's alternate childcare plan (After taxes, it's $1 a day - though I'm not sure how the math works on that one - even taxed at 50% it'd be closer to $2 a day). Martin thinks childcare could be our generation's health care and it would be criminal to let it pass. Certainly a good parting shot. I also liked his proposed removal of the notwithstanding clause - but then as a law-head, I'm down with that.

Harper smiles a lot during the debate. It's sort of a half-smile, seems a little slippery. And someone needs to do something about his hair - makes his head look square.

I'm not sure a lot will have shifted in this debate - scanning the blogs it seems most find that the person they were already planning to vote for did the best. Could this mean a Conservative victory? Or, like last time, will it turn out that their support is too concentrated?

November 19, 2005

Municipal Politics

Well, I guess we have a new mayor. Saying goodbye to Larry Campbell is sad, because he really was a one-of-a-kind politician. I guess he won't be too far out of the spotlight with his new role as senator.

I find it interesting that voter turn-outs of 40% are considered successful in municipal elections. We were told proudly at our polling place (after being turned away from a nearby one where we went accidentally) that they had 40% from the area.

That's damn pathetic. The city touches our lives in some many ways that provincial and federal governments don't. Sure the big stuff, taxes and health care and whether we're at war is in the hands of the other guys. But the city touches our lives multiple times every day. They define when our garbage is picked up, how often the bus comes to the corner, what sort of shops or condo developments are allowed across the street, how far you have to walk to go to a park.

In this urban age where most Canadians live in cities, I think cities should have far more power than they already do. Unlike the the United States, Canadian cities are crippled by lack of jurisdiction. But considering how important they are in my life, they should have more power. (Then maybe more people would make it out to vote.)

August 23, 2005

Bus Days

Just one more day of commuting to school from my current location. I will be ever so much closer, my bus ride knocked down to only three stops. I'll miss my reading time. I had a good hour of reading a day on my return bus trips, allowing me to race through several delicious novels this summer. I also get a certain people-watching joy out of bus riding.

There are a couple of things I won't miss though! One thing is the people who push ahead of you to get to the empty seats. That's irritating.

There's a strange line-culture here too. Because it often rains here, and the bus stop I wait at is not covered, people have a tendency to stand back, under the awning of the nearby building. It's understood that we're all in line. But occasionally someone will go and butt ahead of the rest of us, racing onto the bus when it arrives. Or even worse, they'll try and enter on the back entrance of the bus. I get a certain satisfaction when the bus driver notices and boots them off.

But there are two things that bother me even more. One is the cell-phone thing. There are people who have loud, personal conversations on the bus. It's most intrusive and annoying. It's bad enough I have to hear annoying conversations of people next to me talking inanely about their dull lives. It's infinitely worse to hear only half the conversation. Cell-phone conversations should be kept to the bare necessities in places like restaurants, sidewalks and most of all busses!

And last but not least, the crime of all crimes, the door-blockers. These people don't seem to understand that the door is actually a portal through which people exit the bus. They seem to think that the bay is merely there for them to stand in for five or six stops. They don't even bother to turn around or scoot out of the way when the bus stops at Granville Street or some other busy intersection. They act genuinely surprised when you ask them to move out of the way. My plea to bus-riders everywhere: don't stand in the door unless you are getting off at the next stop. Not two stops or three. The very next one.

Well, if I had time I'd also complain about people who don't take off their schoolbags and then bang into you whenever the bus changes lanes, or people who reach over your seat and open the window without asking, or people who don't move back even when the bus driver asks them too, totally destroying the efficiency of the entire system. But I'll save that for another rant. After all, my bus days are not completely over, just reduced.

July 05, 2005  (One Year Ago Today)

Martha Reveals Her Catchphrase!

Somehow "you're back Boise for apple picking time" doesn't have quite the same ring to it as "You're fired." But you know I'll be watching anyway.

I think this softer, gentler Martha might backfire. Lots of people dislike her because she's supposed to a b*tch. I like her because of it! She's a strong, mouthy woman who doesn't give a damn. She's no Donna Reed, simpering in the kitchen in heels. She wears the pants; she's powerful and tough but she can also make grapefruit halfs with meringues on them.

July 01, 2005

And I Really Liked Tom Cruise Before He Started Dissing Paxil

Creepy. Creepier. Both via TheSuperficial.com.

June 25, 2005

The Funny Thing Is, I Actually Have an Hermès Bag

Is anyone else thinking that if being turned away from a luxury boutique that was CLOSED was Oprah's most humiliating moment, she has lost touch with the common (wo)man? It's just not clear to me how O was treated so terribly; if I went to a store that was closed, I wouldn't expect to be let in; if they didn't recognise her, why would they let her in? The story doesn't make a whole lot of sense the way I've heard it. Maybe we're not getting the whole picture, in which case perhaps she could reconsider having her best friend as her de facto spokesperson. But I guess we'll get to hear all about in the fall when she plans to talk about it on her show. I know I simply can't wait!

In the battle of the talkshow hosts, I think Rosie O'Donnell nailed it on this one. She says in her blog:

one of the most humiliating moments of her life...
oprah
a poor overweight
sexually abused troubled child
from a broken home
that oprah
sufferred one of the most humiliating momemts of her life [sic]
at hermes in paris

hmmmmm

Anyway, apparently Oprah cancelled her order for her 12th $6000 Hermès Birkin bag. I know I'll be cancelling my order too!

June 16, 2005

Google Censorship in China

The Internet can be this amazing tool of liberation, opening people to perspectives they've never seen. Internet cafes pepper the street corners in Asia and Africa, allowing people to communicate with friends and family, or even strangers halfway around the world.

Of course, all this freedom of information is vulnerable to profiteering search engines and undemocratic governments. I saw a news story last night saying that Chinese bloggers using an MSN site were banned from entering phrases like human rights, or Taiwan independence. Also confirmed via BBC.

Google News censors as well, blocking certain stories for Chinese users. Apparently they argue that people wouldn't be able to access the stories anyway because of Chinese IPs blocking the sites. But wouldn't it be better if they at least knew they were being censored.

The reason the search engine blocking is so dangerous is that users can get around firewalls, using sites like this proxy. They can get around banned terms by modifying them like this: human r1ghts. But they can't get to a site if they don't know it's there.

Even from here in Canada, a Google News search for "Google censorship China" brings up quite different results than the same search on Yahoo, with the former's first hit being the above article that contains Google's rationale. Yahoo on the otherhand brings up a other stories that criticise Google more explicitly. Guess the Chinese aren't the only ones who are suffering from censorship.

April 14, 2005

Just when you start to wonder about the human race

Check this out... the Intertron went and raised 10G for Rob and his family to buy his little girl Schuyler a portable speaking device she needs. Schuyler has a rare disorder that impacts her ability to speak. She's also very cute. For those following Rob's story, he and his family moved out to Austin for a new job. However, he was fired by a computer when he missed too many days off sick in his first week. Rob now works at a record store.

Nice to take a little reprieve from reading crim cases to hear a nice story like that. I like to be reminded that not everyone out there is stabbing their husband's mistress or trying to rob fried chicken joints.

March 31, 2005

Co-Habitation Law

It's always kind of interesting to read those "amusing" laws that are still on the books. For example, there's a law in some state against patent leather shoes to prevent a man from seeing the reflection of something he oughtn't to.

But some of these laws are still being enforced, at least in North Carolina.Debora Hobbs was fired from her job as a 911 operator because she was committing a misdemeanor by living with her boyfriend without getting married.

While this 200-year old law against unmarried cohabitation is only occasionally enforced, it apparently gave her sheriff a good reason for firing her. Hobbs and the ACLU are headed to court, not for wrongful dismissal, but to challenge the constitutionality of the law. According to Hobb's lawyer, there are currently 100,000 unwed couples living together in North Carolina.

March 28, 2005

Lawyer Investigated for Impaired Driving Charge

Interesting story about a lawyer who was charged with impaired driving. The former prez of the Law Society is now facing disciplinary measures.

His story is interesting: he says the reason he hid an open beer can in the car of a Good Samaritan who stopped to help him because he didn't want the can to spill in his own car while it was being towed.

He also says the rank smell of beer in his car is due to the spillage of a hundred or so cans he was going to bring to recycling. One wonders why he was so concerned about one hundred and one.

The mouthwash he had in his car, he claims was for first aid purposes. What sort of first aid use does mouthwash have anyway?

Perhaps most alarming is his allegation that he wasn't drunk driving home even though he'd had a combination of whisky and beer. His story is that it would not yet have had time to hit his bloodstream. If that actually became a viable defence to drunk driving, there would be serious trouble because it's awfully hard to prove when beer actually reaches your bloodstream.

Still, because of some RCMP mishaps, the guy didn't actually get charged with impaired driving. But he does risk disciplinary measures.

March 18, 2005

CSI Effect?

Some major recent acquittals: here in Canada, the Air India case. And in the U.S. the celebrity murder, the Robert Blake case.

One hypothesis is the CSI effect. Are juries across the country demanding the sort of high tech evidence we see on TV?

As someone who has had a couple of opportunities to report crimes to the police, I was always amazed at the low-techness of it all. CSI be damned, it's not even like Law & Order! On one occasion, I was told once by a telephone operator when I insisted that the the phone company must have a way to find out who had been crank-calling me "Don't believe everything you see on TV!"

I realise it seems kind of quaint that I kept a Q-tip with saliva of a man who spat on my car, but at the time I really believed they would want that sort of thing to prove who he was. The cop very kindly didn't laugh, but did tell me: "We don't even do that when they steal cars, let alone spit on them."

But the Air India case wasn't a jury trial, it was a judge trial. Could the same issues be at play there? Does the CSI effect affect judges? Or was it simply a matter of not enough evidence?

(N.B. I was surfing Althouse when I found this article.)

March 11, 2005

I Heart Larry Campbell

Our mayor seriously rocks. I attended a talk by him recently and thought you might enjoy some of his choice quotes, as scrawled down by me on a post-it.

On Drugs
Let's make it like tobacco, tax the hell out of it and put it into the health care system.

On Pot
I've never tried it myself. I'm sort of saving myself for that right moment.

On Safe Injection Sites
I still don't believe I need permission to open one.

On Crime
All this booley about Vancouver being an unsafe place to live is just that.

The Downtown Eastside from the point of view of physical safety is probably the safest place in town.

On Americans
They don't like me a lot.

On Drug Education
There's this DARE program in the States that just makes me gag. (He then proceeded to compare it a character in a Cheech and Chong Movie)

Be Real.

On BC Bud
It's the best. Nothing to be ashamed of. (He also noted that Canadian (or BC?) pot makes up only 5% of the pot in the U.S.)

On a Senior U.S. Official's Threats to Close the Border if the Safe Injection Sites Went Ahead
I told him 'then you'll be looking at L.A. in the dark and thirsty.'

On Government
I'm not big on rules and bureaucracy.

February 25, 2005

Another Item on the List of Things I So Don't Care About

Add this right after "Updates on Recent Reality Show Contestants" but before "Anything to do with Paris Hilton." THE POPE'S HEALTH!

We all know the Pope is a sick, sick man. This is not news. This is olds. Do we really need an update every time the man coughs, gets a hangnail, or has yet another operation?

Wake me up when the dude is DEAD. Until then, it stays on the list.

P.S. When I write entries like this, it occurs to me that I should probably remove more identifying details from my website.

February 04, 2005

The Dark Ages Are Back!

I knew things in the U.S. were bad, but it never ceases to amaze me that they keep getting worse. With the current administration it's not surprising that their education minister weighed in to say PBS shouldn't have aired a TV show featuring a lesbian couple on TV. But what's worse is that PBS then actually PULLED the children's show! (You may have to log in to see that article; try login name irriitating78, pw irritating) I thought PBS was supposed to be a progressive station! What next? Is Ellen going to be cancelled? Are you as irritated as I am? Write PBS and tell them so! I'm never going to sit through one of those goddamn telethon things again, that's for sure.

December 09, 2004

S.C.C. Decisions

It's funny, even though I do think it's kind of lame when the government just refers tough questions to the Supreme Court so they can then say to constituents "yeah well, the courts made us do it," I'm still kind of disappointed that the Supreme Court didn't come and say the ban on gay marriage was unconsitutional. They're going to leave it up the MPs. Anyhow, AFTER you leave me a comment letting me know how cute my cats are (below), find your MP and let her or him know you support gay marriage and not some "separate legal framework."

P.S. Isn't Beverly McLachlin rather sexy? Check out her semi-leather outfit!

October 21, 2004

Annoyed By: Narrow-Minded NIMBY Activists

When I left Ottawa there was almost constant radio coverage about a methadone clinic that was opening on Somerset Street. Residents came out in full force whining that they had been misled and that the recovering addicts were posing a threat to a nearby senior's home. Well, no problems so far it seems.

I was looking forward to more progressive attitudes in Vancouver but no such luck. For the past week or so I've had to listen to the hysterical rantings of local citizenry as they wail into CBC's Talkback Line about the dangers of such a centre in their residential neighbourhood. A local home for recovering addicts was recently closed down nearby.

The residents base their opposition to these homes on the fact that they pose a danger to people already in the neighbourhood, but so far I have heard absolutely no evidence that this is the case. What people don't seem to get is that addiction is a disease, an illness. These people have a right to a cure. Last time I checked, property values weren't a fundamental human right.

Banishing recovering addicts to industrial and commercial zones as proposed by some ignoramus (in the last article I linked to) will not help them in their recovery. They need to be integrated back into a regular life for treatment to work. Vancouver has one of the worst drug problems in North America - we should be doing everything we can to assist people; that benefits the while city. While I'm not convinced that there is any danger posed by these homes, even if there were the overall benefit to the city should trump that of a few square blocks off Fraser Street (or Somerset for that matter.)

Just had to get that off my chest. I actually called into the Talkback line yesterday morning to give this spiel there too, but I didn't manage to get up early enough this morning to hear if I had made it on.

August 30, 2004

Major Canadian Cell Phone Providers

Because I am cheap, I decided to figure out exactly how much it's going to cost me to get a cell phone next year. I leave you my opus: a comparison of major cell phone providers in Canada. Please note, this is the comparison of one plan only with the features I was seeking. There may be other options for service which are not reflected here.

The Low-Down

Looks like Telus emerges victorious with Fido running a close second. (Although you get more minutes will Bell, so I may go with them.)

August 20, 2004

ADT Rip-Off

I recently called and cancelled my service with ADT. I had signed a three-year contract but was informed by the sales rep that there was a 30-day cancellation policy. I remember asking specifically because when I moved in, I intended to stay in the apartment for only one year. Now I am being told that I will have to pay the balance of the two-year service if the new tenants do not sign on with ADT. This would be about $630. So far ADT has been inflexible on this, even though the sales rep specifically told me about the 30-day cancellation policy.

I write this to inform people who are considering service with ADT. Luckily I realise that I am not the only one; many other people have been similarly treated by ADT and they share their experiences here.

If ADT does stay firm and demand that I pay the $630, I will be filing a complaint with the Better Business Bureau.

If you have had similar experiences with ADT, I urge you to do the same. For the United States click here. For Canada click here.

Update: ADT agreed to make me pay only $200; while this is still not optimal, I'm moving and I don't want to hassle with a lawyer in the week before I leave. I do recommend that people sign up with ADT request only a one-year at a time contract (or something that ends at the same time as the lease.)

July 13, 2004

Annoyed by: Fake Louis Vuitton

I think I'm starting a category of things that just generally annoy me. There are so many of them. So step back a moment and allow me to slip into a mood of disdain and snobbery. It's a part of my personality I usually try to conceal, but occasionally I just got to let it shine through, a sort of mental release.

Today's pet peeve is the ubiquitous Louis Vuitton bag. I admit that at one point I had LV envy. And even to this day I covet a nice Louis Vuitton suitcase set, just like the one my Barbie used when she and Ken took the campervan on a roadtrip.

But my envy fizzled once J-Lo starting pimping their gear. They've since dumped her but they haven't redeemed themselves in my eyes. The popularisation of Louis has made them so common that I just assume every one I see is a fake. So here are a few tips for LV luggage owners, or simply people who enjoy spotting the frauds.

You can always assume that the bag is a fake when the person is:
A) Dressed in sweats and shopping at Winners
B) Eating out at a McDonalds in Napanee (I really saw this once)
C) Wearing an outfit that indicates a total divorce from anything remotely fashionable (if your scuffed loafers look like you bought them in 1997 at Payless do you really expect me to believe you shelled out almost a grand for a bag?)

Even worse than the fake bag is the pseudo-Louis. This bag from afar looks like a real LV bag, but up close the monogram is actually some other initials, or maybe it's a 'fun design' or something. It's not like LV bags are so incredibly funky or fun. It's a status thing. With the pseudo-Louis you have a badly made bag with zero status and even the most uninitiated know it's not the real thing.
So that's my rant folks.

Maybe some day I'll actually be able to afford a set of LV luggage. But when that happens, I don't want a bunch of hooligans cheapening my ensemble with their whorish fakes. It'll be like whenever I wear my leather pants and some out-to-lunch civil servant inevitably asks "Are those pleather or leather?" As though I would be caught dead in synthetic dead animal. Only real dead skin for me folks. But that's a rant for another day.

P.S. For those compelled to write me hate mail/comments, please check this out before you spew.

July 07, 2004

And you thought Fahrenheit 9/11 was scary!

Have you ever heard of Patrick Henry College? Chances are you haven't. It's a very small, right wing, liberal arts college in Virginia. It opened only four years ago (in 2000) and has only about 240 students (who according to this this article are all white.)

What's kind of strange about this school is that it has extremely close ties to the White House. According to an Economist article, which I can't link here because it's subscription only, there are annual Christmas cards from the Bushes. John Ashcroft's wife is on the Board of Directors.

And according to the same NZHerald I linked article above about 7 of the 100 interns currently employed in the White House are the PHC. Pretty remarkable when you consider their incredibly small campus size. There are about 16 million college students in the US today. PCH represents less than .00002% of that. And yet they represent 7% of White House interns. PCH students have also been placed in the offices of several Congressman and Senators and in Paul Bremer's CPA in Iraq. At least one is also working on the Bush/Cheney reelection campaign. They have been placed in the offices of four senators and eleven congressmen. They have also worked on at least thirteen election campaigns. (A full list of internships here). (Where I come from working on an election campaign isn't called an internship, it's called volunteering. But whatever.) Every single one of the few dozen politicians they have been associated with are Republican. That's a helluva lot more than a coincidence.

Lest you think this is just your average right-wing elitism, think again. This university has some pretty far-out views on religion. They have a statement of faith to which "each Trustee, officer, faculty member and student of the College, as well as such other employees and agents of the College as may be specified by resolution of the Board of Trustees, shall fully and enthusiastically subscribe."

The statement of faith states that Mary was a virgin, all 66 books of the Bible are the literal word of God and that Man is by nature sinful.

Last but not least, my personal favourite: "Satan exists as a personal, malevolent being who acts as tempter and accuser, for whom Hell, the place of eternal punishment, was prepared, where all who die outside of Christ shall be confined in conscious torment for eternity." Got that? Everyone who hasn't embraced Christ burns forever!

They also have a Statement of the Biblical worldview which states among other things that "Husbands are the head of their wives just as Christ is the head of the church."

On government they have this to say: "God himself has ordained government and commands that everyone must submit to government; moreover, there is no authority except that which God has established. (Romans 13: 1-5) Consequently, he who rebels against lawful authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment upon themselves." In case you're wondering how this fits in with U.S current actions there's a long bit about how "some governments are not legitimate; some authorities are not lawful. [...] Nevertheless, there is a proper way to rectify this situation."

On creationism: "Creation. Any biology, Bible or other courses at PHC dealing with creation will teach creation from the understanding of Scripture that God's creative work, as described in Genesis 1:1-31, was completed in six twenty-four hour days. "

On sex:"Any sexual conduct outside the parameters of the faithful marriage of a man and a woman is sin. [...] Pornography, because it degrades God's image-bearers and incites sinful lust, is always evil and merits no legal protection."

On government: "[M]en and women have the inalienable right to own and manage their own property, subject to government regulation only in the unusual situation where the rights of others are endangered. Government systems such as communism and socialism, which give the government primary control over property, are a violation of God's creation order." (Wonder if socialism includes Canada?)

I don't know about you, but personally I find this freaky. The US is breeding a bunch of young, extreme right students, and through their contacts with the current administration they are given advantages in terms of positions in the current government. I strongly believe people are entitled to their own religious beliefs and freedoms. However, these type of far right stuff does not represent the average American (According to this poll only 36% of Americans go to church even once a month or more and 53% believe Jews, Christians and Moslems worship the same God), yet it's being mainstreamed in their government. It seems to me that by their close ties with this school, the current US administration is fostering a lack of religious tolerance and is violating the separation of Church and state. The founders of the United States thought religious freedom was important enough to be enshrined in the First Amendment. It's frightening that the current administration of the US seems to be moving in the opposite direction.

Also interesting is how little coverage there is of this in the US media. All the articles I found were from UK or New Zealand. Americans, turn off Entertainment Tonight and check out what's happening in your own country!

July 05, 2004

Unfair

This story makes me weep every time I hear/read/see it.

June 28, 2004

2004 Elections!

My predictions, made almost two weeks ago were:
Liberals - 129 seats
Tories -104 seats
Bloc - 59 seats
NDP - 11 seats
Independents - 4 seats
Green - 1 seats

Paul Martin forms government (with NDP coalition to get him through budget time).

I've since changed my mind slightly and think that the Bloc will take fewer than I predicted with Liberals/NDP/Green making up the difference. Still holding strong on my thoughts that Conservatives won't get as many seats as Liberals, mainly because I feel their support is too regionally concentrated and they haven't made any headway in Quebec. That's why those polls are so misleading - they don't demonstrate regional focus. Anyone else want to hazard a guess between now and 10 pm?

June 08, 2004

One Man Who's Mad as Hell

This story made me sad. It's the story of this woman who died in the Ottawa Hospital after bowel surgery, written by her husband who was frustrated by the way she was treated.

While I'm not sure it's legally a case of malpractice, it certainly is a good example of how difficult it is for ordinary people to get information and care from doctors. Often doctors aren't willing to look past the obvious, nor do they encourage us as patients to trust our instincts about what's wrong.

If you're from the Ottawa area, or in Canada, you should definitely take this man's survey. I just saw on CTV that he spent $45,000 of his own money to mail out this pamphlet. I hope they listen.

Read more on the CBC

June 07, 2004

Hello! Photoshop!

Is it me or does the kid in this ad have some male pattern baldness going on? Why would they choose a kid who looks so freakishly weird?

June 02, 2004

More Thoughts on MT

I've been checking the SixApart blog regularly to see if they have made any more decisions regarding their pricing. I hope whatever pricing structure they use encourages users to adjust their needs according to the parametres of the tool instead of the other way around.

Example, if I was just getting into blogging now and downloaded the personal edition, chances are I'd make sure not go beyond the 3 blog 1 author limit. It's less likely that I would have experimented with sites like this or this, which are incidentally where I really cut my teeth on what this software can do. I would have fit my needs to the limits of the tool instead of using the tool to figure out my own needs.

Lots of people have mentioned that they've set up blogs for other people - I have too - one was the diary of a friend of mine posted with the CPA in Iraq. It eventually came down due to security concerns but it was fascinating while it was online. I doubt he would have had the time or the inclination to set it up if I hadn't offered. And if that blog (which was the fourth I had) had meant that my costs went from $0 to $69 I can pretty much guarantee that it would have never existed. Ditto for this one which was my fifth blog. Interestingly it gets more traffic than the other four combined.

My fear is that low author/blog limits will dissuade people from experimenting. There should be lots of leeway in the pricing structure to encourage people to create or experiment with blogs that have unusual uses, like temporary project blogs with lots of authors, blogs for friends (within reason), multi-author 'zines, discussion boards, information sharing tools. Unfortunately these projects usually only happen once a person has experience with a personal blog and are often (at the beginning at least) side projects. As a result, I think people are less likely to pay a lot extra for them which is too bad since they are often the most innovative blogs out there.

Let me reiterate, I am willing to pay/donate to MT. But the pricing difference between having 3 blogs and having 4 (or having 1 author versus having 2) should be (a lot) less than $99.95.

May 21, 2004

Using Movable Type

In response to Mena's post I wanted to give a summary of how I use MT.

Currently I run 6 blogs on movable type... I run two personal blogs, including this one, a design blog with free templates, a testing blog that allows me to test out templates and designs, a website tracking law school admissions data, and I've also set up a blog for my brother. Although I'm the author for five of the six blogs, I do use pseudonyms for some of the blogs. Also, I'm planning to set up a site specifically aimed at law students next year. None of the sites are for profit. None of them have ever generated revenue.

I'd like to be able to run about 10 blogs off my site. Currently I pay $150 a year in webhosting fees. Installing Movable Type 3.0 would double my costs for running the websites, and at this time that just seems too steep for something that is a hobby, especially as some of the sites, notably the design and law school site, are essentially services provided free by me to other people. Realistically, I would be unlikely to pay more than $35 to maintain my current level of service, and unless prices fell within that range I'm unlikely to upgrade. If it was a one-time only deal with guaranteed free upgrades, I might be willing to pay a little more, say $60.

May 20, 2004

Train 48 Update

I'm sure you guys are dying to know how my Train 48 flaming went. Well, it would appear there are actually Train 48 fans out there. Someone attacked a typo in my post - I quickly responded by pointing out that her stupid screen-name was misspelled. (NB no one past the age of 12 should try to pass themselves off as "gurl." Nice to know I have a few allies though: Mark from Toronto had this to say:

I have to agree with Hilary's comments, this show is ready for the trash can. a nice big train wreck would be the best way to end the show, BOOM! we all know these so called "actors" have no careers after this anyway...

and Rosemarie, also from Toronto said:

We have to congratulate and thank Hilary as the only lucid Canadian on this site...props to you!!

I was however, relieved to find out that this show apparently does not rely on government subsidies. If Canada was paying for this, I'd have to throw myself on the tracks in protest.

I'm closing the comments on most of my entries, but leaving them open on Train 48! Hey, I dig the traffic!

May 15, 2004

Movable Type 3.0

Well, I've been looking forward to the release of Movable Type 3.0 for a long time. Unfortunately it looks like I won't be upgrading, at least not immediately. I run 6 blogs off this website, 5 for myself, a couple of which are related to designing Movable Type templates. I also have one which I run for my brother. I don't use my real name on all my websites, so it also means that I have 4 authors. I could pare that down to three though. And I suppose I could delete one of the weblogs too, to bring it down to 5. Even with the revised price structure it would still mean I would have to buy a 'Personal Edition' license for $69.95 (special introductory offer only, regular $99.95). That's almost $100 Canadian dollars, which is about what I pay for webhosting for a year. Overall, that doubles the cost of my current websites.

Besides, I haven't really figured out what there is in 3.0 that is really important to me. 2.6 has lots of irritating features, like the rebuild feature, and the fact that deleted entries and weblogs still muddy up the server. I'm not sure if any of that is fixed in 3.0, at least I can't find anything about it in the extensive lit on the website.

There's a lot of rhetoric about their commitment to developers, but there's little rhetoric about their commitment to their actual users, the grassroots support that has made MT the successful phenomenon it has become.

So, yeah, I'm bummed. It's not that I'm not willing to pay for the service, but I think $29.95 would be about my limit. That's already $50 Canadian. And the fact is, there are enough free options out there that I don't have to upgrade.

May 06, 2004

Diverse Views on Iraq

Every morning I get my CNN and CBC clippings e-mailed to me. It is very interesting to note the difference between American and Canadian coverage of recent findings about the treatment of Iraqi prisoners. CNN is always so on message, quoting precisely what the President said and capturing all his fiery rhetoric. CBC is a more balanced, and they often feature, particularly on television, the views of Iraqi citizens and their reactions.

CBC Tuesday:
U.S. officers reprimanded for abusing Iraqi prisoners

CBC yesterday:
Bush offers no apology for abuse of Iraqi prisoners


Bush stopped short of specifically apologizing the for the mistreatment of the prisoners. But U.S. national security adviser Condoleezza Rice told al-Arabiya that 'we are deeply sorry for what happened to these people.'

On CNN:
At first they quoted the denials:
U.S. denies widespread abuse at Iraqi prisons

Then they 'fessed up, but with Bush's talking points:
Bush vows abusers will face justice

When he finally said sorry they caught that too:
Bush 'sorry for humiliation' of Iraqi prisoners
(They don't explain the delay for his apology, but they do report a White House official who explains how "[Bush] was not happy, and he let Secretary Rumsfeld know about it.")

Apologetic Bush Defends Rumsfeld.

It must be so easy to be Bush's press secretary, at least where CNN is concerned. You just write the lines and they repeat the soundbites you want heard!

In the U.S., Americans are several times more likely to hear pro-war sentiment on television - there's a stat on that, I'll post once I find it again. Another interesting factoid is that Canadians who watch mostly US news are more likely to be pro-war than Canadians who watch national news.

Also, this isn't a comparison because CBC doesn't offer this stat (and if did, results might be equally inane), but it's kind of sad that the 'most e-mailed links' today were:
1. CNN.com - Man survives six nails driven into head - May 5, 2004
2. CNN.com - Woman buys 10,000 Mars bars, drives off in limo - May 5, 2004
3. CNN.com - Made-to-order babies prompt ethics debate - May 5, 2004
After all, who cares about torture when a woman forks out for 10,000 Mars bars?

February 12, 2004

Train 48 Sucks

Train 48 continues to baffle me. Does anyone actually watch this show? I was at a Superbowl party recently and as the ad came on (keep in mind Superbowl airtime is Waaaaaay cheaper in Canada) everyone in room groaned and several asked "Does ANYONE watch this?"

For those who've never had the supremely unpleasant experience of flicking past it while on TV, it's about people on a train. That's all they do! Sit on the train and talk about work and stuff. Like holy shit, why would I want to come from work and sit and watch actors pretending to be commuters talking about work? Didn't they become actors so they wouldn't have to be commuters?

Well according to their website people actually do watch this crud. They even have a discussion board where Train 48 fans actually say stuff like "I'm a huge Train 48 fan!" (Please! Do not admit that!)

So I've tested it by submitting the following comment:
"Train 48 is the WORST show to hit primetime TV. I know you have Canadian content rules, but don't insult my intelligence by giving me the most low-budget piece of crap ever to denigrate Canadian airwaves. The scripts are so inane it's like they've been improv'd by a group of sixth-grade pot-smokers. And I've known chimpanzees who were better actors (and had better stylists). Please don't insult Canadians by putting this garbage on the air. Are any of the fans here actually real people, or are they all Global employees?"

If any of these people are real fans I'll totally get flamed. But otherwise if they just plead with me pleasantly and act all Canadian about it I'll know they're all working for the man and their work is getting edited by Global execs before they post.

Anyway, if anyone actually watches this show, I'd really be interested to hear from you, because I don't believe you exist!

Well, I'm off to watch CSI, a sufficiently big budget American show. But for those still eager for their dose of Canadian content, check out Corner Gas which airs on CTV, oh roughly 17 times a week. (No wonder a million people tuned in to the series premiere. You could hardly avoid it!) Still, it's much wittier and much more Canadian than Train 48. And it's also not centred in Toronto, which I think most Canadians, even Torontonians, might appreciate.

February 27, 2003

I'm Not Anti-War, I'm Pro-Peace

Check this out.

And this.

November 04, 2002

Go Away!

If you're not in favour of socialised health care, get out of here and away from my blog!

Oh yeah, and snow is pretty. Even in November. Especially in November...

October 11, 2002

Good Enough?

Welcome kids, to today's Fun Friday Activity. Today we're assessing whether or not you would be eligible to immigrate to Canada. Already live here? Well play along for kicks! Find out whether or not your own country would want you if you were currently a citizen of Somewhere Else!

How does it work? Well just click here take this nifty little test to find out whether or not you'd be eligible. You get assessed according to Proven Standards, such as Language Capability, Education, and that tested favourite, Overall Suitability.

Find out whether or not you are likely to be a Productive Member of Society!

After taking the test

Didn't do so well? Feeling bad? Don't worry, I didn't pass it either! I guess we're Just Not Good Enough.